5 Ways Mcgirt Law Impacts Tribal Jurisdiction

Quick Links :

The Mcgirt v. Oklahoma decision, issued by the Supreme Court in 2020, has significantly impacted tribal jurisdiction across the United States. The ruling, which established that much of Oklahoma remains Native American territory, has far-reaching implications for tribal sovereignty and the relationships between tribes, states, and the federal government.

In this article, we will explore five key ways that the Mcgirt law impacts tribal jurisdiction, including its effects on tribal authority, federal prosecution, land use, and more.

1. Expanded Tribal Authority

The Mcgirt decision has led to a significant expansion of tribal authority, particularly in Oklahoma. By recognizing that much of the state remains Native American territory, the court has given tribes greater control over their lands and the ability to exercise their sovereignty.

This expanded authority has significant implications for tribal governance, as tribes can now exercise greater control over law enforcement, zoning, and other areas of governance. For example, the Muscogee (Creek) Nation has established its own police department and is working to develop its own justice system.

Benefits of Expanded Tribal Authority

The expansion of tribal authority has several benefits for Native American communities, including:

• Greater control over their lands and resources
• Increased autonomy and self-governance
• Improved public safety and law enforcement
• Enhanced economic development and job creation

2. Impact on Federal Prosecution

The Mcgirt decision has also had a significant impact on federal prosecution in Oklahoma. By recognizing that much of the state remains Native American territory, the court has given the federal government greater authority to prosecute crimes committed on tribal lands.

This change has significant implications for the prosecution of crimes such as murder, rape, and assault. In the past, the state of Oklahoma had primary jurisdiction over these crimes, but now the federal government has the authority to prosecute them.

Benefits of Federal Prosecution

The shift to federal prosecution has several benefits, including:

• Greater accountability and transparency
• Increased resources and expertise
• Improved public safety and crime prevention

3. Changes to Land Use and Planning

The Mcgirt decision has also had a significant impact on land use and planning in Oklahoma. By recognizing that much of the state remains Native American territory, the court has given tribes greater control over their lands and the ability to develop their own land use plans.

This change has significant implications for economic development, environmental protection, and public health. For example, the Cherokee Nation is working to develop its own comprehensive plan for land use and development.

Benefits of Tribal Land Use Planning

The shift to tribal land use planning has several benefits, including:

• Greater control over land use and development
• Improved environmental protection and conservation
• Enhanced economic development and job creation

4. Impacts on State and Local Governments

The Mcgirt decision has also had a significant impact on state and local governments in Oklahoma. By recognizing that much of the state remains Native American territory, the court has given tribes greater control over their lands and the ability to exercise their sovereignty.

This change has significant implications for state and local governments, which must now work with tribes to provide services and exercise jurisdiction. For example, the state of Oklahoma is working to develop new agreements with tribes to provide law enforcement and public safety services.

Benefits of Collaboration

The shift to collaboration between state and local governments and tribes has several benefits, including:

• Improved public safety and law enforcement
• Enhanced economic development and job creation
• Greater accountability and transparency

5. Future Implications and Challenges

The Mcgirt decision has significant implications for the future of tribal jurisdiction in Oklahoma and beyond. As tribes continue to exercise their sovereignty and expand their authority, they will face new challenges and opportunities.

Some of the key challenges and opportunities include:

• Developing new agreements with state and local governments
• Establishing and funding tribal justice systems
• Addressing the legacy of historical trauma and violence

Conclusion

The Mcgirt decision has had a profound impact on tribal jurisdiction in Oklahoma and beyond. As tribes continue to exercise their sovereignty and expand their authority, they will face new challenges and opportunities. By understanding the implications of the Mcgirt decision, we can work towards a future that is more just and equitable for all.